Sometimes we just sit down and write anything without having a any
deal of thinking about the target audience of what we are writing.
Moreover, we do not have any kind of tools; but, peer reviews and
comments from readers to understand and qualify our writing skills. I
was thinking that it would be nice to have a mechanism to test my
articles; browsing around I found an article in wikipedia about a test
named Flesch-Kincaid Readability you can read the whole article in here.
Despite the fact that the test might help into measuring readiness of
the text in terms of sentences length and word length using Flesch Reading Ease test, or changing the equation to get Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level
test. Investing time to think about the target audience; to take
language, audience education, even the medium used to present the
article; may change the perception about the article greatly by the
readers.
People is getting used to read from digital mediums,
such as PC or cellphones; however, the traditional medium is printed;
such books or newspapers. Digital books are more common nowadays;
although, when it comes to read a book the favorite media is the old
fashioned paper. Readers looking form information in the internet have
different reading patterns, they tend to do skimming reading; which
means, reading pieces of the whole page, the starting sentences of the
paragraphs in a effort to read only the strictly necessary to figure
out if the article worths being read completely; therefore, when
writing for a digital medium we have to pay special attention to
starting sentences on paragraphs.
This behavior on reading has
lead to a number of mechanism two I would like to mention here; one to
encourage fast reading and other one to assist skimming reading; since
the 70's a technique know as Rapid Serial Visual Presentation has been
used in a experiment at the Standford University Persuasive Technology
Laboratory; the technique is used in a web site called buddybuzz.org
there several content providers can present their text in the tiny
cellphone screens, RSVP consist of flashing one word at the time
allowing to draw attention on that particular word before moving to the
next one in the text; allowing speeds up to 1000 words per minute, this
mechanism have prove useful for those interested in reading their
favorite news or blogs in their cellphones.
Skimming
experience can be enhanced and eased by means of tools; a group of
researches at Palo Alto Research Center in California develop a tool
called ScentHighligth, the tool is specially useful with digital text,
they use correlation, spread activation and word co-occurrence to get
search keywords related and highlight sentences based on a base of
correlated words you can read the entire paper here.
Sadly both techniques are only experimental and our articles will have
to be carefully written and correctly targeted to the audience to avoid
loosing the effect that we want to achieve and all our effort will be
wasted. I all the browsing I did about reading I found a site where the
readability test can be done to a page, so I posted this words in the
internet and ran the test here this are the results:
Total sentences 26
Total words 501
Average words per Sentence 19.27
Words with 1 Syllable 302
Words with 2 Syllables 114
Words with 3 Syllables 62
Words with 4 or more Syllables 23
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 16.97%
Average Syllables per Word 1.61
Gunning Fog Index 14.49
Flesch Reading Ease 50.84
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 10.96
Then
from the previous results the reader can be an advance student of 10th
grade and its at level with publication such as Time magazine. So
readability is not that bad; although, it will also depend on the
contents and the target audience.
Allan Cascante @ 05:35
Be the first to rate this post
- Currently 0/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Comentarios
writing, redability